I think I’m going to have a series of Trek related posts over the course of the next few days, as my thoughts on various elements of the subject are extensive. So I apologize to people who don’t care about Trek, we’ll get back to regularly scheduled content soon!
The subject of series reboots is something that is quite the hot topic at the moment. From Star Wars to Star Trek to Magic the Gathering to Doctor Who… there are more than a few franchises that have gotten a new start in the 21st century. Even comic book heroes are getting into the act! Today I’d like to discuss a few things about the Star Trek reboot in specific. This topic is largely precipitated by an article that I read on this blog, which discusses another “hot topic” reboot – Magic: The Gathering. In fact, this blog has a number of posts about series reboots in several geek franchises. Basically, his point is that the type of customers that are ranting and raving about changes are not the sort of customers that are good for business.
Obviously, people complaining about the Star Trek reboot have done so for some time now, since the original movie was in pre-production and they learned that someone other than William Shatner would be Captain. In my experience, the older a Star Trek fan is, and the earlier in life they embraced the show, the more likely that they will be against the reboot. Some of their arguments are good. It is a little silly that Kirk went from being a Cadet on the verge of severe punishment after the Kobayashi Maru incident to being Captain of the Enterprise in a few days. There are many things to complain about. These things don’t bother me though.
One of the biggest reasons that people don’t watch or enjoy Star Trek is because of the fans. Sadly, there are too many stigmas about the level of obsession that Trekkies have – that they have no lives, that they live in their mom’s basement, that they’re grossly overweight and never bathe. And yes, this stigma is true for some individual fans. But the large majority of us Trek lovers are not actually that creepy. We have jobs, we have lives, we take showers. Sure, we might dress up in costumes, but have you seen some of the stuff that people wear to football games nowadays?
Let’s be honest:
Football uberfans are every bit as weird as Star Trek uberfans. Dressing up like someone or something that you like isn’t bad or frowned upon in and of itself, unless the people choosing to dress that way are particularly socially inept and/or dirty.
Back to my point. Yes, you will lose some die-hard fans because of the reboot. No, this is not necessarily a bad thing. Let’s be realistic – what fandom wants fans that bitch and nitpick about every single detail of their fandom? Something I’ve noticed on fan sites is that the people who really, truly hate the movie (and not pretending to hate it because that’s what the cool kids are doing) are annoying. They argue and nitpick about everything. They’re not particularly fun associate with.
These are the people who – when I see them at a con – I instantly resent and loathe them. When they question me on a forum because I said “Chief of Operations” instead of “Chief Operations Officer” – I want to smack them silly. There are nearly no benefits of being that rigid and unchanging. One of the keys of success is to constantly be able to evolve to changing circumstances.
That’s not to say that I think we should turn our back on all that is known Trek, and disregard the wishes of the fans. It’s a fine line between being successful as a reboot and just making something that is completely unrelated and untrue to the franchise. Yes, the new Trek movies have more action. But do they stay true to the goals and purposes of the franchise? In many ways, yes they do.
Let’s be honest, there’s no way to get a perfect interpretation of Trek. Trek can never be the same without the old writers, and actors, and Gene. However, the current actors, writers, directors, etc. can certainly do their interpretation of Trek, catering to their strengths (CGI), and modernized a bit. Fans don’t want to see their fandom die off, and the simple fact of the matter is that with younger generations being born in an era after the Trek TV series, fan numbers will eventually die off. These new films bring the old movies and TV episodes back to life. They inspire Paramount to make High Definition DVD releases of the old episodes. It causes companies like Netflix to make these episodes available for everyone with an internet connection. It is a very good thing for the franchise as a whole.
A few years ago, I was lamenting that a lot of older “cult” classics was becoming popular at places like Hot Topic. At the time, I loathed the new fans, people who suddenly thought Clockwork Orange was the best movie ever, and who quoted The Crow excessively. But then I realized that while that does introduce these “kids” (for lack of better term) to the franchise, it’s not necessarily a bad thing. Yes, it’s annoying when some 15-year-old wears a cheap Clockwork orange tee-shirt, and quotes the movie without truly understanding what it’s about. It’s annoying when they only like the film to laugh at all the phallic imagery throughout. But most of these annoying fans won’t be around long. Either they’ll research more about the movie and they’ll understand more what the significance was, and not just for the giant penises. They’ll be the truly insightful sort of fan that’s a pleasure to be around. Much like I argued earlier about “pretend” geek chicks eventually either losing interest in the “game” or actually growing into a respectable geek woman – “new” Star Trek fans will do the same. This reboot will create yet another generation who grew up on Trek, who dream of being Captain Kirk and exploring the galaxy. Who knows, this may inspire young people to want to be astronauts, to demand that the space program is reinstated. This may inspire them to want to learn, to respect people who are different, and to try to create a world where there is peace.
A world that Gene Roddenberry would be proud of.




I am a big fan of the new movies, but never really appreciated the series growing up; what do you recommend for a good jumping off point to give it another shot now that my sci-fi palette has (hopefully) matured since i was 6
Thom Obarski recently posted..Philly Comic Con Announcement
I think I would skip TOS to be honest. While it is good, and I do appreciate it, it’s quite campy and if that’s not your preference, you’d do better watching it later. The Next Generation is generally the best starting point, although the first season is extremely weak. Force yourself to get through that and you won’t be disappointed. The second season is a lot better, and the show really comes into it’s own in the third season. See season one as being less plot-centric, and focus on how the characters develop – seeing Picard, Data, etc. grow is really brilliant. Deep Space 9 is nearly my favorite (TNG is my favorite), but I think it’s best after you’ve watched TNG so you understand a bit more about the setting and the timeframe.
So… I’ve been a member of KLAW (Klingon Legion Of Assault Warriors) for some time now. Being fully immersed in the sometimes smelly pool of Trek fans I can tell you that there are two very large and very divided factions. Those that fear change and those that embrace it. Old and young are on both sides of this table. When the reboot first came out a good bit of the fans we call friends were firmly opposed to the idea and hated the inconsistencies and much like you stated before… and wanted rigidity. Enter MegaCon 2009. A large group of us were there in full ridge and from out of nowhere came what seemed like an army of young girls dressed in Star Fleet skirts… Everything changed. Eyebrows raised and cod-pieces felt suddenly crowded. A realization was made by a lot of the old diehards (HAHA! I said hard). There was new blood. New fans. New costumes.
Bring on the ST reboots… I honestly can’t wait to see what Benedict’s talent brings to the screen. Oh and Klingons.
Oh Garza, even after all these years I can trust you to say something completely random and make me laugh my ass off. Never change, man. That’s a great point as well. It’s good to know that there are some older fans that are accepting of change. Change is necessary to success. And apparently necessary to create young, slutty fan girls as well.
Your thesis, deconstructed, seems to hold that bad Trek is better than no Trek, because that bad Trek may lead some back to the good Trek.
The flaw in your take on this remains that crap isn’t particularly inspirational.
“It is a little silly that Kirk went from being a Cadet on the verge of severe punishment after the Kobayashi Maru incident to being Captain of the Enterprise in a few days.”
This is, perhaps, the generation gap in stark relief: It’s by no means “a little silly.” It’s so enormously asinine that such, in and of itself, is sufficient to call the entire film’s credibility into question … and it contributes to a foundation of absurdity that affects anything constructed upon it.
(Do I really want to see Captain Cadet commanding in the next film? No, because he didn’t do anything to genuinely earn either his position, or even the chance to claim it. Instead, the writers awarded him the center seat, based on name recognition from the dimension in which he actually *is* a hero. Give me a fuckin’ break.)
There’s a point at which you say, “Oh, come on! That just wouldn’t happen—in any freakin’ reality!” and there are so many of these in this particular film that if you’re actually paying attention to anything but the effects and the pretty people posing and pouting, you’re just shaking your head at the contrivances, presumptions, and general silliness thinking, ‘No. I won’t buy into this. I deserve better. We *all* deserve better.’ Perhaps that’s why many of us grognards look at you otherwise bright twenty-somethings and want to tear our hair out, saying, “I just don’t understand how you guys shine stuff like that on. How can you like that? It’s dumb and you’re not! Stand up and say, ‘No … no more crap!’”
For those of us who grew up on Trek, it is in some measure sacred, whereas to many of you guys it’s just another kewl franchise. When someone like J.J. Abrams (who’s arguably the most overrated director working today) admits to never having been a fan, and then makes a film that not only disregards that which has come before, but disdains it, well … it’s difficult to think that certain elements of the film were just coincidentally destructive. Instead, we think that little dickhead did it on purpose, as a hearty, “Fuck you!” to old school enthusiasts. It boils down to this: Either he didn’t know what he was doing …
… or he *did*. I’m not certain which is worse.
I found your attempt to trivialize and marginalize those who dislike the film and present legitimate, compelling reasons for doing so oddly disturbing, perhaps because I expect more from you.
You dismiss the serious flaws therein with an offhand, “That doesn’t bother me,” but dwell on the lunatic fringe of Trek fans to make your point. Scarecrow would be proud of you. Here’s the thing: You’re smarter than this. A crappily written film *should* bother you, precisely because you’re smart. We need people like you on the side of the angels, not sayin’, “Well, it was dumb, but that’s OK.”
No. It’s *not* OK.
I mean, listen to the responses you’ve gotten to this essay. One guy thinks it’s great because now hotties are coming to the conventions.
[Vitriol directed at complete stranger excised as petty and unnecessary—thought it *was* cathartic.]
Is it likely that some young fans who went to see the new Trek film will check out the various series? Sure. But that would have occurred if the script had worked on other levels besides the adolescent, too, so it’s not exactly a telling or even significant point. Wouldn’t it have been better if the writers had instead created a story that appealed to the entire demographic, rather than sacrificing the loyal core for a chance at the ADD generation, who’ll move on to the latest thing in the time it takes to receive and read their next text?
“With great power comes great responsibility.” Great intelligence carries the same burden. Because you’re one of the smart people, TGC, you don’t get to turn your brain off and accept shit as shiny, crap as cream. I expect, and more, *require* better of you.
*Get on it.*
As I concede, you’re right on most regards (aside from the fact that Michael Bay is far, far worse than JJ Abrams). This is of course a matter that I’ll likely discuss at more length in the near future.
Fortunately, I said “arguably.” I’m perfectly willing to defer to your judgment on that, so long as you stipulate that while Bay is monumentally overrated, Abrams is still extremely overrated.
Fair enough?
You’re the film brat, after all.