I Still Live!

I just wanted to give everyone a head’s up that yes, I do in fact still live!

Recently, life as gotten a bit busy, I’ve been working a bit more… and I was accepted as an Intern with Geek Girls Network!

I will still be posting here (including links to my posts over at GGN, which will release on Mondays and Wednesdays), but things will be a bit slow until I get life a bit more settled. I will still create unique content for this site as well, mostly stuff that’s a bit more “personal” than GGN’s focus.

Seriously Literate Ladies – We Deserve Better

I read a variety of literature. For the most part recently I’ve concentrated on Urban Fantasy, or YA Fiction. Generally, these are books that I can quickly read, which is important as once I get into a novel I can’t put it down, and I just don’t have the time to devote myself to extensive tomes at the moment. Unfortunately, my recent forays into the genre have been somewhat disappointing, and have caused me a great deal of concern. Yes – there are gems in the genre. There are some truly lovely protagonists, fascinating plots, and well-developed relationships. But when you examine a lot of these books, the plots are the same. You have a girl who for some reason doesn’t fit in with the world around her. Inevitably – generally because of the interference of a “special” man – she goes through a period of “I don’t deserve this, I’m not good enough” before finally getting in touch with her “Inner Goddess” and riding off into the sunset with her dark knight.

I understand that “fantasy” is an integral part of urban fantasy. I know that one of the most primal, involving fantasies for women are fantasies about men – specifically, “bad boys.” It only stands to reason that urban fantasy is going to milk this trope for all it’s worth, and I’m OK with that. But unlike the days of old, stories like Pride and Prejudice or North & South, these aren’t your “harmless” sort of bad guy. These men are often vampires, werewolves and other variety of supernatural creature. And while these supers aren’t intrinsically “bad” in all urban fantasy mythos, the characters that the female protagonist fall for often are. Of course, they’re all rich, powerful, incredible attractive. But many of them are distant, and controlling, with a common theme being the man stalking the girl – as that’s what these women often are. Because another common theme of course is virginity – a theme that’s truly deserving of its own post one of these days. Many of these women are young, naïve, self-conscious; eager to grasp onto anything strong enough to support them.

Of course, the reason for their lack of self-worth is often a set of “non-flaws” – traits that under most circumstances wouldn’t be considered flaws. One of my favorite is the ever popular “pale, skinny and clumsy” trope. I can speak from personal experience – none of these things are flaws. And if they are regarded as flaws by some men… well, everything is. Not every man likes everything, and that sucks, but that’s life. Chances are, that’s not the guy for you.

Let’s focus on the men for a moment. I accept that the male love interests in these stories are going to be “better” than average. But the scenarios that these novels present are simply unhealthy, and set extremely unrealistic standards for women. First, many of these men act in a way that is barely a step above abusive. They often put the leading women in positions where their physical and emotional well-being are at risk. They get our protagonist involved with the often-deadly realm of the supernatural. They often expect her to change or adapt to either be “better” for them, or to handle the environment that they exist in. And while often there is a “reason” why these men are brusque, or distant, or controlling, and the protagonist often finds the “secret” to getting him to open up in the end, these things rarely happen in the real world. Teaching young women that a man that’s cruel to you can be changed is only going to result in women chasing toxic men in real life, hoping that lurking within is an “inner Edward Cullen” who is deeply in love with them. But let’s look at Twilight a bit more closely. Sure, Edward was in love with Bella, but in the end she had to change to survive the half-Vampire child he’d placed within her. She gave up her very humanity – arguably the thing that was her sole redeeming trait as a person – so that they could have their “happily ever after.”

But let’s table that for a moment. Let’s forget about the “darker” sides of these men, and consider the reason for our protagonist’s interest in the first place. Invariably, these male love interests are nearly godlike in appearance, ludicrously wealthy, and in control of the world around them. But they rarely actually have common interests with the protagonist. Let’s take Christian Grey from Fifty Shades of Grey, for example. His hobbies are all extremely risky, adrenaline chasing pursuits – flying planes/helicopters, gliding, driving fast cars, and of course playing the piano, because that shows us just how classy he is. Anastasia, well, she likes reading, and turning down dates from the other guys around her for reasons that aren’t ever really explained. They have nothing in common. She’s attracted to him for completely superficial reasons. Do we really want to send the lesson to young women that the most important traits in a man are his wealth and his looks? It’s bad enough girls seem innately attracted to bad boys, and that often the people who suffer as a result of this are nice guys. Can’t we have a male who actually has something in common with the girl that he’s interested in? Can’t we stress that it’s more important to have someone in your life that understands and appreciates you than it is to have someone that’s ludicrously wealthy? Can’t we have conversations that focus on the character’s common interests, and not “I’m not good enough for you” and “Let’s talk about how my life is constantly in danger because of my affiliation with you.”

The most obnoxious thing about this is the fact that these relationship-centric plot lines are completely unnecessary to sell millions. Look at the Harry Potter books. There was nearly nothing romantic at all in the first few novels (obviously partially due to the character’s ages), and the series still sold extremely well. And when the relationships did come about, they were healthy, and developed amongst friends who already knew and cared about one another. Or let’s see a story where our protagonist is actually a strong enough woman to save herself, and doesn’t need to have someone who barely seems to respect her to get her out of trouble.

We women are the current and future mothers of the world. Do we want to send our daughters, our nieces, our friends, into the world with the belief that what matters the most about a man is how much money he makes, or how his abs appear to be sculpted from marble? Do we want women in the world who think it’s irrelevant if a man treats her poorly because “he can change?” Do we want girls racing into a marriage with someone who they have nearly nothing in common with? We deserve better.

KRE-O Enterprise Announcement

Tonight, images of the new KRE-O Enterprise came out.

Personally, I’m pretty underwhelmed. Compared to the Lego Star Wars kit… this just looks like crap. (Edit: In comparison, take a look at this rather impressive B-wing model)

With this news came a tease trailer for a new standalone short featuring Kirk and the gang:

It’s being produced by Bad Robot (JJ Abrams’ production company) so I’m remaining skeptical for now.

Edit: I (erroneously) believed KRE-O to be a Lego subsidiary based on some initial commentary I’ve read. They are not, in fact, Lego owned. However, the point stands – this sucks.

A Focus on Dystopia

I’m a member of several forums, and recently a member of one of them posted a link to this article, which focuses on the fact that Science Fiction is currently preoccupied with dystopian and time travel related plot lines. And while I must admit that I am not thrilled with the status quo of the genre as a whole, I believe that this is a temporary state, and one that is explainable as more than just “Hollywood is lazy and can’t make new ideas.” At it’s heart, Hollywood is a business, and one that is very concerned with profits. Their goal is to sell, and it’s not completely their fault that dystopia is what sells.

Again, whilst I’m not happy with the current state of Sci Fi, I believe it to be a natural response to the current artistic and cultural philosophy of Metamodernism. More simply put, with the things that are going on in the world today, the sense of optimism towards the future that accompanied Postmodernism has begun to recede. We oscillate between having hope spurned on by the developments of technologies, and having despair at the injustices that we see in the world around us. Our optimism is being tempered by a realism drawn from our exposure to the world at large. We know now the true horrors of war, of disaster, of famine. We see in full color and motion the sorts of inhumanities that humanity is capable of. We question whether man is innately good or evil. A similar cultural phenomenon was experienced during the time of the World Wars, because then (as is the case now), there was media coverage of war that was unprecedented. Just as the camera gave people who would never be exposed to suffering a graphic view of it, so has the internet, and at a far more rapid rate.

My generation had little exposure to the realities of war before September 11th. Sure, Operation Desert Storm was going on when I was a child, but that wasn’t real for me. It was something that I saw mentioned on TV and that I had baseball cards dedicated too, but it wasn’t like I really knew that many people that were going off to war. September 11th occurred 2 days before my 18th birthday. I was old enough to understand it. I was old enough to be terrified that the draft was going to be brought back. I don’t think that our parents and grandparents generations were raised in a situation like mine, where the world seemed like an altogether peaceful place that just exploded overnight. Add to that the focus on Standardized Testing in schools, which means that History is less of a focus then it used to be, and you have a generation that doesn’t really weigh reality with the proper understanding. I mean, let’s take an overly generalized look at recent American history:

World War II: 1940-1945
Peace: 1945-1950
Korean War: 1950-1953
Peace: 1953-1959
Vietnam War: 1959-1975
Peace: 1975-1991
Persian Gulf War:1991
Peace: 1991-2001
War on Terror: 2001
“Peace”: 2001-2003
Operation Iraqi Freedom: 2003-Present

The generations preceding mine had several experiences with war, especially wars that were considered to be unpopular. But from 1975-2001 there really wasn’t a major “War” effort. The whole concept of being at War is more of a shock to younger Americans than. And my generation is starting to write books, televisions shows, movies. But more importantly, my generation represents the most important consumer demographic for films and books. Hollywood knows its target demographic.

The result is that we have a hard time weighing what we consider new knowledge versus our hopes and our dreams. So we see these post-apocalyptic, dystopian scenarios as eventualities. It’s hard for us to understand that things have always been bad, and that in fact there have been times where things were worse. We want to see a world where we still exist, where we still thrive, despite the hardships that are placed on us. We want to believe that even if we decimate the world we live on that there will still be hope, that humanity will not be extinct. And Hollywood is more than happy to cater to that fact.

What are your thoughts? Do you like the dystopian focus of recent Science Fiction? Do you think it’s overdone?

Gratuitous Boob Post. Because I Can.

Eventually, I am going to do a post on some of the many idiosyncrasies of being a geek and a girl, but something humorous came up the other, so I wanted to write about it in specific before I completely forgot. That and I’m a little loopy and I wasn’t quite able to commit to anything serious.

Victoria’s Secret is having their Semi-Annual Sale, and I’m in the need of bras due to a certain canine companion who has a penchant for… well… this:

As I was looking through their site, I came across a wireless bra, and I got excited. I’d seen a few articles postulating about web-enabled clothing, and I was ready to high five Victoria’s Secret for actually bringing it to the market.

Then I realized that they meant “wireless” like no underwire, not wireless like web enabled :-(

So I was understandably disappointed, and posted to that effect on Facebook. The resulting conversation, due to the general awesomeness of my friends, was understandably entertaining. Just think – why should boobs be left out of the social networking revolution? Then the suggestions began pouring in. It’s obvious the implications of the almighty “Poke.” But what about some of Facebook’s other features? Perhaps our Boobbooks will feature “Boobs you may know.” And of course, the powerful “Like” will be in full play on Boobbook too.

And it’s not just Boobbook. Imagine if our tatas found their way over to Twitter? Good ol’ Lefty can send you a tweet when she wrangles her way out of your dress at a party. Of course, this would be the ultimate in “tech support.”

Why do I like this idea so much? Because one of the biggest things women are insecure about is their boobs. Who says boobs and tech have to be separate? So in closing, thanks to all my friends for their boob feedback, and I hope you and yours have a lovely evening.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...